![]() |
Crewe and Nantwich Liberal Democrats Campaigning for Crewe and Nantwich and Cheshire East |
| Crewe and Nantwich Liberal Democrats | <info@crewe-nantwichlibdems.org.uk> |
Welcome to Crewe and Nantwich Liberal DemocratsElections to the new Cheshire East Unitary Council took place on 1st May. Cheshire East Council will bring together the boroughs of Macclesfield, Congleton and Crewe & Nantwich, and Cheshire County Council, taking over local government services including highways, education, social services and refuse collections on April 1, 2009. The Liberal Democrats took two seats in Crewe South, and are now the opposition to the Conservatives on East Cheshire Council. Thank You from Elizabeth Shenton8.54.43pm BST (GMT +0100) Fri 23rd May 2008
Lib Dem Crewe & Nantwich by-election candidate Elizabeth Shenton has thanked voters in Crewe and Lib Dem members and supporters who have helped her campaign. The result was:
Conservative majority 7,860 (18.9%) 17.6% swing Labour to Conservative 7.1% swing Labour to Liberal Democrats Tories in turmoil?10.45.10am BST (GMT +0100) Mon 12th May 2008 The nomination of Mark Walklate as an independent candidate for the Crewe and Nantwich by-election has left local Tories campaign staff red faced and in turmoil. Mark Walklate stood as a Conservative candidate in the local elections several times, most recently in 2006 and again in 2007, but left the party after an internal falling out. His nomination papers for the by-election feature two prominent and well known local Conservative activists fuelling speculation of an internal split in their camp. Crewe and Nantwich Liberal Democrat agent Neil Trafford said: "With the local Conservatives in turmoil and the presence of a UKIP candidate, it is highly likely their support will split three ways." Archive of earlier news stories. Printed and hosted by Prater Raines Ltd, 82b Sandgate High Street, Folkestone CT20 3BX.Published and promoted by Crewe and Nantwich Liberal Democrats, 43 Lunt Avenue, Crewe CW2 7LZ. The views expressed are those of the party, not of the service provider. |
|